Back to Portfolio
Case Study 02 · Maritime Analytics · InsurTech

PEMA Marine

Designing the marine risk analytics platform — enabling underwriters and maritime insurers to assess entire vessel fleet portfolios, visualize claims geographically, and make faster, data-confident risk decisions.

MaritimeInsurTechAI AnalyticsData Visualization
ClientMarsh McLennan / Blue[i]
My RoleSenior Lead UX Designer
TimelineJan 2023 – Dec 2023 (12 months)
PlatformWeb Application (Desktop)
ToolsFigma, Miro, Mapbox (geo layer), Jira
45%
Faster Assessment
Risk assessment time per vessel fleet
$7.8M
Portfolio Savings
Identified over-coverage and rate errors
78%
Faster Triage
Claims incident triage via geo-mapping
Data Utilisation
Data sources actively used vs previous
The Challenge

Navigating Maritime Complexity

Marine insurance is one of the most complex and data-rich lines of insurance. Underwriters managing large shipping company accounts needed to assess hundreds of vessels simultaneously — their routes, cargo types, age, flag state, claims history, and exposure across global trade lanes.

The existing toolset was a combination of Excel, Lloyd's data feeds piped into static tables, and email-based claims reports. There was no map. No fleet view. No AI signal. Underwriters were effectively flying blind when pricing risk for global shipping clients.

"I manage a fleet of 180 vessels for one client. I couldn't tell you right now which three are the highest risk without pulling six different reports."

— Senior Marine Underwriter, Marsh
🗺️

No Geographic Visibility

Zero spatial view of fleet positions, high-risk trade routes, or claims incident clustering by region. All data was in flat tables.

⏱️

Slow Risk Pricing

Assembling the data needed to price a single fleet renewal took 2-3 days of manual work across multiple data sources and systems.

🔎

Reactive Claims Management

Claims incidents were managed reactively by email. No early-warning system, no clustering detection, no severity scoring.

Discovery & Research

Deep Dive into Maritime Workflows

I embedded with the Marsh Marine team for three weeks, conducting contextual inquiry sessions with underwriters, claims handlers, and client-facing brokers. I also studied 6 competitive marine analytics tools — from Lloyd's Intelligence to Windward — to map the capability landscape.

The single biggest insight: underwriters trusted spatial reasoning. When I showed paper maps during interviews and said "imagine you could see your fleet here," eyes lit up. The map wasn't a nice-to-have — it was the mental model they already used. We just needed to digitize it with live data.

Research Findings

Underwriters spent 60% of their time on data retrieval vs risk analysis

Geographic clustering of incidents was invisible in tabular data — critical for pricing

AI-generated risk scores per vessel were the most anticipated feature

Clients wanted self-service fleet reports without waiting on brokers

Persona 1 — The Marine Underwriter

Manages 5-20 large shipping company accounts. Needs fleet-level risk overview, vessel-level drill-down, and AI risk scoring to support pricing decisions. Primary user.

📋

Persona 2 — The Claims Handler

Receives incident reports, triages severity, coordinates surveyor dispatch. Needs geographic incident view, severity scoring, and timeline tracking.

🏭

Persona 3 — The Shipping Client

CFO or Risk Manager at a shipping company. Uses self-service portal to view their fleet's risk profile, upcoming renewals, and claims status.

Architecture & Flows

Information Architecture & User Flow

Before designing screens, I mapped the full product structure and end-to-end user journeys — ensuring every module had a clear place in the hierarchy and every task had a frictionless path for underwriters and claims handlers.

Information Architecture
PEMA Marine Information Architecture
User Flow — Fleet Risk Assessment
PEMA Marine User Flow Diagram
Design Decisions

Map-First Architecture

01 · DEFINE

IA Workshop

Card sorting with 8 underwriters to define information hierarchy

02 · COLLECT

Data Audit

Mapped 14 data sources to establish what's available vs needed

03 · BRAINSTORM

Concept Sprints

3-day design sprint generating 12 concepts — narrowed to 2 directions

04 · DEVELOP

Prototype

Interactive hi-fi prototype with real AIS vessel data for user testing

05 · PRESENT

Usability Testing

4 rounds of testing — each with 5 marine underwriters

06 · IMPROVE

Iteration

14 significant design changes driven by usability findings

🗺️

Map as the Primary Navigation Layer

The entire platform is anchored to a live world map showing vessel positions, risk heat zones, and incident clusters. Users can zoom from global view to individual vessel in two clicks. This replaced 6 separate report screens.

🤖

AI Risk Score per Vessel

Every vessel receives a composite AI risk score (1-100) derived from 18 signals: age, flag state, class society, route history, claims frequency, cargo type, and more. Underwriters can interrogate the score breakdown in detail.

Incident Early Warning

Claims handlers receive a real-time alert feed with AI-severity scoring. Incidents in high-loss regions or involving repeat-offender vessels are automatically escalated, reducing triage time from hours to minutes.

Design Output

Key Screens

PEMA Marine — Fleet Risk Dashboard
PEMA Marine Fleet Risk Dashboard
PEMA Marine — Dashboard Rate & Interest View
Dashboard Rate Interest View
Dashboard Collapsed View
Dashboard Collapsed View
Industry Benchmarking
Industry Benchmarking
Logistics Benchmarking
Logistics Benchmarking
Cargo Benchmarking
Cargo Benchmarking
Client Claims Dashboard
Client Claims Dashboard
Client Claims Dashboard
Client Claims Dashboard
Results & Impact

Outcomes That Moved the Needle

PEMA Marine launched to Marsh's marine underwriting teams in Q1 2024. The map-first design changed how underwriters approached risk assessments — shifting from document-centric to spatially-aware workflows.

45% faster average risk assessment time per fleet account

$7.8M in over-coverage and mispricings identified in first 9 months

78% faster claims triage via geographic incident clustering view

5× increase in data sources actively referenced during renewal decisions

Adopted by 8 of Marsh's top 10 marine underwriting teams within 6 months

AI risk score accuracy rated "highly reliable" by 88% of underwriters

"The map changed everything. I can see in 30 seconds what used to take me a day. And the AI risk scores — they're not perfect, but they're good enough to trust for initial triage."

— Lead Marine Underwriter, Marsh (Post-Launch Interview)
💡

Key Learnings

The most important design lesson: domain experts have strong mental models that you should amplify, not replace. Underwriters already thought spatially about risk — they just lacked the digital tool to match that mental model. Building the map as the primary navigation layer was not an innovation; it was an alignment. The innovation was connecting it to live data, AI scoring, and actionable workflows.

← Previous PEMA Insights Next Case Study → JazzX Mortgage — Borrower

Interested in working together?

I'm open to senior UX roles and consulting engagements.

Get in Touch →All Case Studies